🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to protect women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially return the legislation for further consideration if he has objections.

President Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in other member states